Skip to content
Siete qui: Home Festival Festival 2010 Love and death, tragic fatalism and solipsistic pathos
Love and death, tragic fatalism and solipsistic pathos PDF Print E-mail
Karlowicz died in 1909, aged only 33, swept over by an avalanche on the Tatra mountains, while on an excursion. He was at the time, along with Szymanowski, one of the most renowned persons in the musical panorama of Poland. Educated in Germany (he studied at Heidelberg, Dresden and Berlin, besides Warsaw) and influenced by Wagner as well as Tchaikovsky, Strauss, Grieg and Skrjabin, he nevertheless knew how to mould a personal idiom which he specifically inserted in the symphonic poems, a genre congenial with his creative vein. A solid dominion of form, inventive richness and colour sensibility constitute the high-profile elements of his works, as well seen in the programme score: Bianca da Molena, the charming Symphonic Prologue culled from the Muzyka do bialej golabki op. 6 (Music for the White Dove), intended for a theatrical pièce – now neglected – by Jozafat Nowinski, centred on the dull affair of a roaming knight and of a fatal love, leading to the heroin’s death and a rejection of worldly pleasures. The first performance took place in Berlin on the 14th April 1900. Being instrumented for a large orchestra, the Prologue presents itself right from the blazing opening, a real coup de théâtre, not extraneous to a certain Dvořák, followed by the spell of a beautiful theme bounced back gracefully among woods, brass and strings. Chivalric fanfares emerge with puissance over the magma of the bows, innervated with ruddy clangs and punctuated by the rolling strokes of percussion. Soon enough the score heats up, suggesting the force of passion. Then, in the driving (and Tchaikovskian) central section, there comes through a felt sense of a hanging destiny. Mysterious abysses and gloomy figures advance with a threatening allure in a panorama of tragic fatalism. Finally, the wing strike: transfigured, there reappears the burbling melodic theme, returning for a last time to seduce us with his hearty communication skills.
It is after being inspired by Dostoevsky’s recount of the same name that Prokofiev composed The Gambler, preparing himself the libretto. Both ambitious and innovative, the opera was finished between 1915 and 1917, but it was not performed owing to the October Revolution. Taken in hand again in 1927/28, it was only put on stage on the 29th April 1929 at the Théâtre Royale de la Monnaie in Brussels. It is from the score, marked with a radical modernism, especially under a harmonic profile, with grotesque effects and angular paces intended to restore the atmosphere of the subject’s hallucinated and stretched distancing effect, that in 1931 the author extracted a suite of exceptional tonal richness, published by Gutheil and performed in Paris in March 1932. TIt is an admirable compendium of the opera, a load of mastery put into action by featuring, on a psychological plane, the different characters in their acts. So one can meet the youthful boldness of the tutor Alexei possessed by the feverish woodworm of gambling and marked by whirling and beaming images as well as the slanting rhythms and hazy boggles. The grandmother, herself a hardened gambler, is sketched with traits which are at times grotesque, at others dream-like, allusive dance rhythms and melodic sketches replete with charme, yet deformed as through a lens; at the place where the flown vacuity of the General, a stereotype mannequin, is outlined with mocking tones and the harshness of a caricature. His counterpart is a picture of Pauline, of crawling wickedness, rendered by a musical setting of rampant ambiguity fleshing out moral depravity. Then finally, the unrestrained epilogue by the demon climes, realised by assembling materials obtained from the two intermezzos: a true and proper throbbing tourbillon of sound images looking like the mimesis itself of the roulette, a protagonist with his unceasing «metallic vitality».

Most famous, kind of despaired spiritual testament, indeed more: a suffered confession imbued with biographism and drunk with exasperated pathos (from where the epithet with which he entered de jure in history), the Sixth Symphony by Tchaikovsky saw the light in that inauspicious 1893 which marked the unaccidental death of the Russian musician, at the end of a life tormented by a forcefully repressed homosexuality. He conducted it himself in his Saint Petersburg on the 28th October, nine days before stepping in (more or less) willingly to his end. If the gloomy Adagio of the opening having a leaden atmosphere already foretells the climate of the whole score, this is how the Allegro moves from a slender bud to take off then with that harrowing and lyrical theme which would have by itself guaranteed immortal fame to the author. Vigorous pen strokes, like blustering waves, thicken upon each other with an entwining and tragic emphasis in the wide development, projected by a piercing crash, down below up to the effective pleading during which the persuasive theme resounds for a long time, peaking in a kind of restrained choral. Among the melodic shores of the second part, nearly a tender Valse caressante in the unusual and lame meter of 5/4, one admires the nostalgia affectively participating in a rather set past, a true distillation of bygone times. Then, in the sturdy Scherzo consisting of erupting dazzles and the solemn gait of a march mindful of certain steps of the Nutcracker, an energetic sprightliness prevails, having an apparent solar matrix, optimistic and joyful, like a self-imposed serenity at full force. Yet all this involves an illusory optimism: this is revealed by the wailing Adagio positioned to seal the whole symphonic set-up, intended to reach an aggravated emotional climax, before collapsing, closing itself solipsistically on itself in the deaf mists of the final measures. An extreme, heartrending appeal to humanity, which could have only followed an absolute silence: of artist and soul alike.